<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Real Estate Radio USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realestateradiousa.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com</link>
	<description>Internet Money! Money On The Internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:01:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Barry Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-7058</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-7058</guid>
		<description>Great question Steve,

We are interviewing an accountant next week and I&#039;ll be sure to post a link...but from what I understand the 1099 doesn&#039;t have to be issued until tax time. You know how you get your tax document at the end of the year or beginning of the new year...well from what I understand, it&#039;s the same thing. But since I do not know for sure, I will find out definitively for you. But one thing is for sure..don&#039;t assume that it&#039;s lost.

While they may be real good at losing notes, they are pretty good about IRS guidelines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Steve,</p>
<p>We are interviewing an accountant next week and I&#8217;ll be sure to post a link&#8230;but from what I understand the 1099 doesn&#8217;t have to be issued until tax time. You know how you get your tax document at the end of the year or beginning of the new year&#8230;well from what I understand, it&#8217;s the same thing. But since I do not know for sure, I will find out definitively for you. But one thing is for sure..don&#8217;t assume that it&#8217;s lost.</p>
<p>While they may be real good at losing notes, they are pretty good about IRS guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-7057</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-7057</guid>
		<description>Barry, is there a chance that Chase did not issue a 1099c after my short sale, or should I assume it was lost. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry, is there a chance that Chase did not issue a 1099c after my short sale, or should I assume it was lost. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8217;s Internet Marketing Reform by What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/07/27/obamas-internet-marketing-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-7056</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/?p=12508#comment-7056</guid>
		<description>[...] Is it possible that we all should come to expect that backroom dealing and covert ops are the norm in those parts? Heck, one guy has parlayed it all the way to Pennsylvania Avenue&#8230;but that&#8217;s another story altogether. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is it possible that we all should come to expect that backroom dealing and covert ops are the norm in those parts? Heck, one guy has parlayed it all the way to Pennsylvania Avenue&#8230;but that&#8217;s another story altogether. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NAR Announces the 2008 Going Out Of Business Sale!..maybe not but it sure looks that way by What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2008/01/08/the-nar-announces-the-2008-going-out-of-business-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-7055</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/2008/01/08/the-nar-announces-the-2008-going-out-of-business-sale/#comment-7055</guid>
		<description>[...] we called the National Association of Realtors and talked to their head legal counsel and arranged an interview. Ralph Holmen agreed to do the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we called the National Association of Realtors and talked to their head legal counsel and arranged an interview. Ralph Holmen agreed to do the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Estate Short Sale Key To Market Normality Says NAR by What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/01/06/real-estate-short-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-7054</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12198#comment-7054</guid>
		<description>[...] the friendliest of blokes towards the NAR and we have been quite vocal about the puppeteering of Lawrence Yun but now we have even been left scratching our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the friendliest of blokes towards the NAR and we have been quite vocal about the puppeteering of Lawrence Yun but now we have even been left scratching our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Short Sales &#124; Short Sale &#124; Don&#8217;t Lose Your Home! by What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/07/15/short-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-7053</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/?p=12499#comment-7053</guid>
		<description>[...] There are some investors out there who are looking to partner with Realtors on Short Sales. Wherein the agent gets a listing, and partners with an Investor to buy, renovate and re-sell the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are some investors out there who are looking to partner with Realtors on Short Sales. Wherein the agent gets a listing, and partners with an Investor to buy, renovate and re-sell the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NAR Is A Sex Offender&#8217;s Best Friend by What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2008/03/26/the-nar-is-a-sex-offenders-best-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-7052</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is The National Association Of Realtors Hiding From Its Members?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/2008/03/26/the-nar-is-a-sex-offenders-best-friend/#comment-7052</guid>
		<description>[...] here at Real Estate Radio haven&#8217;t been the friendliest of blokes towards the NAR and we have been quite vocal about the puppeteering of Lawrence Yun but now we have even been left [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here at Real Estate Radio haven&#8217;t been the friendliest of blokes towards the NAR and we have been quite vocal about the puppeteering of Lawrence Yun but now we have even been left [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Barry Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-7051</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-7051</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom there&#039;s nothing misleading whatsoever. If you actually know how to CORRECTLY execute a short sale you make sure that the Mortgage AND the Note are released and satisfied. That&#039;s my point exactly and you have underscored what we have been saying over and over. Weekend warrior short sale &quot;experts&quot; are leaving their clients hanging in the wind. 

They don&#039;t even know the difference between the two documents. When we perform short sales, as we also teach our clients, you MUST get full release AND satisfaction or you really have not done a short sale at all.

I appreciate your comment but please make sure to actually read what we write! Anything to the contrary leaves you with &lt;em&gt;FootusInusMouthus&lt;/em&gt; disease!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom there&#8217;s nothing misleading whatsoever. If you actually know how to CORRECTLY execute a short sale you make sure that the Mortgage AND the Note are released and satisfied. That&#8217;s my point exactly and you have underscored what we have been saying over and over. Weekend warrior short sale &#8220;experts&#8221; are leaving their clients hanging in the wind. </p>
<p>They don&#8217;t even know the difference between the two documents. When we perform short sales, as we also teach our clients, you MUST get full release AND satisfaction or you really have not done a short sale at all.</p>
<p>I appreciate your comment but please make sure to actually read what we write! Anything to the contrary leaves you with <em>FootusInusMouthus</em> disease!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by tom</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-7044</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-7044</guid>
		<description>This advice is very misleading.  Yes, you will be relieved of the mortgage obligation if a short sale is approved but that does not mean you are released from the NOTE.  There are two parts to the loan, the mortgage and mortgage note and the banks can, and often do pursue a deficiency judgment based on the difference between the amount owed and the amount received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This advice is very misleading.  Yes, you will be relieved of the mortgage obligation if a short sale is approved but that does not mean you are released from the NOTE.  There are two parts to the loan, the mortgage and mortgage note and the banks can, and often do pursue a deficiency judgment based on the difference between the amount owed and the amount received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ForSaleByOwner.com v. Jay Thompson And Realtors Round 2 by If I was a Real Estate Broker&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2008/11/26/forsalebyownercom-jay-thompson-and-realtors-round-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7011</link>
		<dc:creator>If I was a Real Estate Broker&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12144#comment-7011</guid>
		<description>[...] ForSaleByOwner.com v. Jay Thompson And Realtors Round 2 Back in June of this year, US News &amp; World Report hosted an installment of the Housing Rumble with Luke Mullins of the Home Front column mediating a debate between Jay Thompson, a Phoenix real estate broker and Greg Healy, the vice president of operations at ForSaleByOwner.com, a Web-based company &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ForSaleByOwner.com v. Jay Thompson And Realtors Round 2 Back in June of this year, US News &amp; World Report hosted an installment of the Housing Rumble with Luke Mullins of the Home Front column mediating a debate between Jay Thompson, a Phoenix real estate broker and Greg Healy, the vice president of operations at ForSaleByOwner.com, a Web-based company &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Barry Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-7003</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-7003</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephanie,

Thanks for the kind words. You are right, I am not an attorney and I am in Florida so please make sure to check with a Nevada attorney on this matter.

That being said, if you are not on the title, and not on the loan then you have no obligation on any note that your husband is the borrower on. So if you can qualify for a mortgage on your own, you most assuredly can make your own purchase. However here is where the problem may come in and where I really can&#039;t say for sure what goes in in Nevada.

That is to say, I don&#039;t know how your State views the marital household. This is a bit tricky. States like Florida have very different laws regarding the homestead of a residence. I would be wrong to offer you advice on the marital home of a couple in Nevada. You definitely want to contact an attorney out there. In the interim, I will email your question to an attorney I know in Nevada and get his response. 

Once I have his response I will email you and post it here. Thanks for the great question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephanie,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words. You are right, I am not an attorney and I am in Florida so please make sure to check with a Nevada attorney on this matter.</p>
<p>That being said, if you are not on the title, and not on the loan then you have no obligation on any note that your husband is the borrower on. So if you can qualify for a mortgage on your own, you most assuredly can make your own purchase. However here is where the problem may come in and where I really can&#8217;t say for sure what goes in in Nevada.</p>
<p>That is to say, I don&#8217;t know how your State views the marital household. This is a bit tricky. States like Florida have very different laws regarding the homestead of a residence. I would be wrong to offer you advice on the marital home of a couple in Nevada. You definitely want to contact an attorney out there. In the interim, I will email your question to an attorney I know in Nevada and get his response. </p>
<p>Once I have his response I will email you and post it here. Thanks for the great question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-6999</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-6999</guid>
		<description>Hi Barry,

You seem to have a lot of knowledge. I realize you are not a lawyer, but maybe you can help. I live in Nevada. My husband purchased a home prior to us being married. It is now between $100K-$140K below value (half the value of the house), depending on who you talk to. I am not on the loan, title, or in any way connected to the house, other than being married to him. Our mortgage company will not help us with a loan modification that will help us enough, and it appears our options are short sale or foreclosure. I have pretty good credit and an income of my own. We do however, share our checking account, making it difficult to show what money is whose. My question is this: can I legally purchase a home for us to live in while short selling his house? Can the new house be considered an asset toward the debt of the old house? Could the money used to purchase the new home  be considered money that could have been used to pay the previous mortgage? (It is worth mentioning that the mortgage company would not speak with us until we were behind, so we made the tough decision to not pay our bill.) Please help! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barry,</p>
<p>You seem to have a lot of knowledge. I realize you are not a lawyer, but maybe you can help. I live in Nevada. My husband purchased a home prior to us being married. It is now between $100K-$140K below value (half the value of the house), depending on who you talk to. I am not on the loan, title, or in any way connected to the house, other than being married to him. Our mortgage company will not help us with a loan modification that will help us enough, and it appears our options are short sale or foreclosure. I have pretty good credit and an income of my own. We do however, share our checking account, making it difficult to show what money is whose. My question is this: can I legally purchase a home for us to live in while short selling his house? Can the new house be considered an asset toward the debt of the old house? Could the money used to purchase the new home  be considered money that could have been used to pay the previous mortgage? (It is worth mentioning that the mortgage company would not speak with us until we were behind, so we made the tough decision to not pay our bill.) Please help! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ultimate Short Sale Case Study by Buying A Short Sale For Maximum Profit With The Help Of A Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2010/03/10/the-ultimate-short-sale-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-6987</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying A Short Sale For Maximum Profit With The Help Of A Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/?p=12861#comment-6987</guid>
		<description>[...] you’ll get something out of our short sale case study and turn things around. You’ll be amazed when you experience the bliss of short sale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you’ll get something out of our short sale case study and turn things around. You’ll be amazed when you experience the bliss of short sale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Happens When Short Sales Fail? by Buying A Short Sale For Maximum Profit With The Help Of A Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2010/02/26/short-sales-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-6980</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying A Short Sale For Maximum Profit With The Help Of A Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/?p=12844#comment-6980</guid>
		<description>[...] let’s identify some of the biggest problems with short sales failing and not not closing and what you as an investor needs to look for and what you as an agent need to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let’s identify some of the biggest problems with short sales failing and not not closing and what you as an investor needs to look for and what you as an agent need to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flipping Houses by Buying A Short Sale For Maximum Profit With The Help Of A Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2010/03/11/flipping-houses/comment-page-1/#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying A Short Sale For Maximum Profit With The Help Of A Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12310#comment-6979</guid>
		<description>[...] legal. Agents, perhaps you should sneak away from the water cooler and learn the anatomy of a short sale flip. We’re going to be doing a case study on a short sale and it should give you great insight as to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] legal. Agents, perhaps you should sneak away from the water cooler and learn the anatomy of a short sale flip. We’re going to be doing a case study on a short sale and it should give you great insight as to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-6974</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-6974</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note Barry. I am having my attroney here in Illinois review. 
Have you seen Chase allow a short sale where they will loss $60K+/- to someone who is not behind on the note, nor show all the signs of a hardship? The hardship for me is with my partners (divorce and job loss) more so then with me (mortgage in my name, house held in deed within our corporation). The only other hardship I can think of involves the property value going from $292K a couple years ago down to $175K today. Also the fact that rental income has been adversely affected by the economy. If I were Chase, I would not grant me a short sale... In my mind I am everything that is wrong with the process. We (me and my 4 partners) got in over our heads and are looking for cost efficent way out (one that is going to hurt my credit)..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note Barry. I am having my attroney here in Illinois review.<br />
Have you seen Chase allow a short sale where they will loss $60K+/- to someone who is not behind on the note, nor show all the signs of a hardship? The hardship for me is with my partners (divorce and job loss) more so then with me (mortgage in my name, house held in deed within our corporation). The only other hardship I can think of involves the property value going from $292K a couple years ago down to $175K today. Also the fact that rental income has been adversely affected by the economy. If I were Chase, I would not grant me a short sale&#8230; In my mind I am everything that is wrong with the process. We (me and my 4 partners) got in over our heads and are looking for cost efficent way out (one that is going to hurt my credit)..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Barry Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-6970</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-6970</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan and thanks for your comment,

Here&#039;s your first problem. You have a Realtor playing lawyer drafting a document that is wholly wrong. You said the document read in part as follows: &quot;&lt;em&gt;the contract is contingent upon Sellers Lenders (and all lein (sic) holders) approval of this purchase&lt;/em&gt;&quot; ... unless you have sold the house to the bank this is wrong. The bank HAS ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE!! 

As we have said many, many times. A short sale is just like a conventional sale. The only thing different is that in requesting the payoff we are asking the bank to take less. Payoffs are always requested in ever deal (where the seller has a mortgage)..we just want them to take less. 

So the only thing we are asking the bank to do is to approve the reduction in their payoff. Who in their right mind would give the bank power to approve or disapprove the purchase!

However, this particular agent did understand to request a full release AND satisfaction of the mortgage, which is vitally important. Once the satisfaction is in hand AND filed in the County records you CAN NOT be subject to a deficiency judgment. 

But you had be absolutely sure that you have a release and satisfaction filed. If you need an attorney with specific knowledge of this subject matter, please let me know and we&#039;ll put you in contact with somebody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan and thanks for your comment,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s your first problem. You have a Realtor playing lawyer drafting a document that is wholly wrong. You said the document read in part as follows: &#8220;<em>the contract is contingent upon Sellers Lenders (and all lein (sic) holders) approval of this purchase</em>&#8221; &#8230; unless you have sold the house to the bank this is wrong. The bank HAS ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE!! </p>
<p>As we have said many, many times. A short sale is just like a conventional sale. The only thing different is that in requesting the payoff we are asking the bank to take less. Payoffs are always requested in ever deal (where the seller has a mortgage)..we just want them to take less. </p>
<p>So the only thing we are asking the bank to do is to approve the reduction in their payoff. Who in their right mind would give the bank power to approve or disapprove the purchase!</p>
<p>However, this particular agent did understand to request a full release AND satisfaction of the mortgage, which is vitally important. Once the satisfaction is in hand AND filed in the County records you CAN NOT be subject to a deficiency judgment. </p>
<p>But you had be absolutely sure that you have a release and satisfaction filed. If you need an attorney with specific knowledge of this subject matter, please let me know and we&#8217;ll put you in contact with somebody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can We Finally Put To Rest This 1099 vs. Deficiency Judgment Issue? by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2009/03/05/1099-vs-deficiency-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-6966</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/?p=12289#comment-6966</guid>
		<description>Barry,

Thanks again for keeping this open..
I have asked questions in the past concerning short sales..  I recently got an offer on a short term rental single family home in Orlando area. We owe Chase $216K, the offer is for $175K. My Realtor sent the contract for review and signatures. I asked for a contingency concerning &quot;full release&quot;. She sent a Short Sale Addendum for me to sign. The buyer has signed. Point #1 on this addendum is concerning Approval of Lender. This point says the contract is contingent upon Sellers Lenders (and all lein holders) approval of this purchase. It goes on to state that the lender agrees to accept a payoff which is less than balance and will grant release and satisifaction of the mortgage. 
This looks like standard wording. Have you seen Chase accept something like and grant the full release? Is there something else I should be asking for? I will be having an attorney go over everything. I am in Illinois, the house is in Florida. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,</p>
<p>Thanks again for keeping this open..<br />
I have asked questions in the past concerning short sales..  I recently got an offer on a short term rental single family home in Orlando area. We owe Chase $216K, the offer is for $175K. My Realtor sent the contract for review and signatures. I asked for a contingency concerning &#8220;full release&#8221;. She sent a Short Sale Addendum for me to sign. The buyer has signed. Point #1 on this addendum is concerning Approval of Lender. This point says the contract is contingent upon Sellers Lenders (and all lein holders) approval of this purchase. It goes on to state that the lender agrees to accept a payoff which is less than balance and will grant release and satisifaction of the mortgage.<br />
This looks like standard wording. Have you seen Chase accept something like and grant the full release? Is there something else I should be asking for? I will be having an attorney go over everything. I am in Illinois, the house is in Florida. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assignment Of Contract: How To Make Money In Real Estate Without Having Any by Flipping Houses</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2010/02/24/assignment-of-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-6965</link>
		<dc:creator>Flipping Houses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/?p=12836#comment-6965</guid>
		<description>[...] of the easiest ways to make money flipping houses is to wholesale deals via an assignment of contract. But that&#8217;s just one of many ways that we will be discussing how you make great money real [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the easiest ways to make money flipping houses is to wholesale deals via an assignment of contract. But that&#8217;s just one of many ways that we will be discussing how you make great money real [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Short Sale Tip #13 : 5 Questions To Ask The Seller&#8230;Before Taking The Listing For a Property in Foreclosure by tom</title>
		<link>http://www.realestateradiousa.com/2008/03/03/short-sale-tip-13-5-questions-to-ask-the-sellerbefore-taking-the-listing-for-a-property-in-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-6964</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestateradiousa.com/blog/2008/03/03/short-sale-tip-13-5-questions-to-ask-the-sellerbefore-taking-the-listing-for-a-property-in-foreclosure/#comment-6964</guid>
		<description>guys how do you people get the short sale listing... what kinds of package do you mail to someone who is a in default.  hw do you get the listings..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys how do you people get the short sale listing&#8230; what kinds of package do you mail to someone who is a in default.  hw do you get the listings..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
